The €15M Question: Your Survival Guide to Cybersecurity Compliance for Connected Products
THIS BLOG WAS WRITTEN BY THE COMPLIANCE & RISKS MARKETING TEAM TO INFORM AND ENGAGE. HOWEVER, COMPLEX REGULATORY QUESTIONS REQUIRE SPECIALIST KNOWLEDGE. TO GET ACCURATE, EXPERT ANSWERS, PLEASE CLICK “ASK AN EXPERT.”
Look, let’s not waste time. You’re here because the ground is shifting beneath your feet. You build incredible smart, connected products – the kind that define modern life. But now, a wave of new regulations like the EU’s Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) are coming.
We’re talking about non-compliance penalties, under the CRA, of up to €15 million or 2.5% of your total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher.
That’s not a typo. And it’s not some distant, abstract threat. This is a board-level, business-continuity risk that fundamentally changes the economics of bringing a connected product to market. It transforms cybersecurity from a feature into a non-negotiable license to operate.
The anxiety of staring at a mountain of regulatory text, trying to figure out where to even begin? The knowledge that your supply chain is a black box of third-party components? You’re not alone. This guide is designed to cut through that noise. It’s not just another summary of the rules. It’s a strategic roadmap for navigating the new reality of cybersecurity compliance for connected products, turning overwhelming complexity into a clear, actionable plan.
Table of Contents
- The Compliance Clock is Ticking: Key Deadlines and Financial Stakes
- Decoding the Directives: NIS2 vs. Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)
- The Supply Chain Mandate: Why an SBOM Isn’t Enough
- The Manual Compliance Trap: A Recipe for Failure
- The AI-Powered Path Forward: From Reactive to Proactive Compliance
- Key Takeaways for Your Next Strategy Meeting
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Your Next Step Towards Compliance Confidence
The Compliance Clock is Ticking: Key Deadlines and Financial Stakes
Urgency is the new normal. The grace period for understanding these regulations is over, and the timeline for implementation is aggressive. Ignoring these dates isn’t just risky; it’s a direct threat to your market access in the EU.
Here are the critical milestones you need circled in red on your calendar:
- October 17, 2024: EU Member States must adopt and publish measures to comply with the NIS2 Directive.
- October 18, 2024: EU Member States must apply those measures.
- September 11, 2026: The CRA’s vulnerability reporting requirements kick in. Manufacturers must have a structured process to report actively exploited vulnerabilities to ENISA (the EU Agency for Cybersecurity).
- December 11, 2027: Full application of the Cyber Resilience Act begins. By this date, your products must meet all the essential cybersecurity requirements to be sold in the EU.
The financial penalties are designed to be impossible to ignore. For the CRA, non-compliance with the essential cybersecurity requirements, manufacturers obligations and vulnerability reporting obligations can result in fines of up to €15 million or 2.5% of global turnover. Non-compliance with other obligations (e.g., failure to draw up the EU declaration of conformity, affix the CE marking, etc.) can carry penalties of up to €10 million or 2% global turnover. This isn’t a cost of doing business; it’s a potential existential threat.
Decoding the Directives: NIS2 vs. Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)
One of the first points of confusion for many organizations is understanding how NIS2 and the CRA fit together. They aren’t interchangeable, and in many cases, you’ll need to comply with both. Think of it this way: one governs the organization, the other governs the product.
| Feature | NIS2 Directive | Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | The security of the “network and information systems (NIS)” of organizations. | The security of the “products with digital elements” themselves, throughout their entire lifecycle. |
| Who It Applies To | Essential entities” and “important entities” in the sectors of high criticality (e.g., energy, healthcare, digital infrastructure, etc.) and other critical sectors (chemicals, manufacturing, digital providers, etc.). The designation depends on factors such as size, sector and criticality. | Manufacturers, importers, and distributors of hardware and software products sold in the EU. |
| Core Mandate | Implement risk management measures, report incidents, and secure supply chains at the organizational level. | Build secure-by-design and secure-by-default products, manage vulnerabilities, and provide security updates for the product’s expected lifetime. |
| The Connection | An organization covered by NIS2 (like a hospital) must secure its network. The CRA ensures the connected medical devices on that network are secure from the start. |
Here’s the bottom line: If you manufacture a smart energy meter, the CRA dictates the security standards for that meter. If you are the utility company that uses that meter to provide electricity, NIS2 dictates the security standards for your company’s operations. They are two sides of the same coin, creating a chain of responsibility from the component manufacturer to the end-service provider.
Notably, NIS2 has significant implications for the critical product manufacturing sector. Entities involved in the manufacturing of the following products, typically those exceeding the size threshold of a medium-sized entity (more than 50 employees or €10 million turnover), are categorised as “important entities” and must therefore ensure the security of their organizational network and information systems:
- Medical devices, including in vitro diagnostic medical devices;
- Computer, electronic and optical products;
- Electrical equipment;
- Machinery and equipment;
- Motor vehicles, trailers, and semi-trailers;
- Transport equipment.
The Supply Chain Mandate: Why an SBOM Isn’t Enough
Both the CRA and global best practices like the US Executive Order 14028 have put supply chain security front and center. The mandate is clear: you are responsible for the security of every single component in your product, whether you wrote the code or not.
This has led to a huge focus on the Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), a formal, machine-readable inventory of all the software components and libraries that make up your product. And yes, having an SBOM is a critical first step. It’s the “list of ingredients.”
But an ingredients list doesn’t tell you about allergies or nutritional value. It doesn’t tell you how those ingredients interact or what risks they pose.
That’s where Threat Surface Documentation comes in.
This is the critical distinction that most companies are missing.
- SBOM (The Inventory): Answers “What is inside my product?” It lists components like log4j-core-2.14.1.jar or a specific Linux kernel version.
- Threat Surface Documentation (The Context): Answers “How can my product be attacked?” It maps out all potential entry points for threats – APIs, network ports, user interfaces, physical access points – and analyzes how the components from your SBOM could be exploited through those vectors.
Compliance requires both. You need the inventory (SBOM) to know what you have, and you need the contextual risk assessment (Threat Surface) to understand your actual vulnerabilities. Manually creating an SBOM for a complex IoT device with hundreds of third-party dependencies is a massive undertaking. Continuously updating it and cross-referencing it against new vulnerabilities is practically impossible without help. Which brings us to the next, unavoidable truth.
The Manual Compliance Trap: A Recipe for Failure
Let’s be honest about what it would take to manage this process manually.
Imagine a product security manager, let’s call her Sarah. Her company makes connected industrial sensors. To comply with the CRA, she needs a complete SBOM for each sensor model.
- She starts by emailing her firmware team. They send her a partial list from memory.
- She then has to chase down dozens of suppliers for every third-party component, from the Wi-Fi module’s chipset to the open-source library used for data encryption. Some suppliers don’t respond. Others send outdated or incomplete information in a PDF.
- After weeks of work, she has a sprawling, error-prone spreadsheet. The next day, a new critical vulnerability is announced – the infamous “Log4Shell” all over again.
- Now, Sarah has to manually scan her entire spreadsheet to see if the vulnerable component is listed. Then she has to verify which products are affected and begin the chaotic process of patching, testing, and deployment.
- All the while, she’s supposed to be documenting every step for a future audit, proving due diligence.
This isn’t a scalable process. It’s a guaranteed failure. At IoT scale, manual compliance is a fantasy. It’s too slow, too prone to human error, and creates zero institutional knowledge. When a regulator comes asking for your vulnerability management policy and evidence of its execution, a folder full of spreadsheets and email chains won’t cut it. You need a centralized, automated, and auditable system of record.
For more information, explore how to build a robust product compliance automation framework that can withstand regulatory scrutiny.
The AI-Powered Path Forward: From Reactive to Proactive Compliance
The only viable way to manage the scale and complexity of modern product cybersecurity compliance is to leverage automation. Specifically, AI and machine learning are emerging as the essential tools for transforming this process from a manual nightmare into a manageable, continuous business function.
Think about it this way. Instead of chasing down information, a modern compliance platform acts as a central nervous system for your product security.
- Automated SBOM & Evidence Generation: AI-powered tools can automatically scan firmware and software binaries to generate a complete and accurate SBOM in minutes, not weeks. As your developers build new versions, the platform automatically updates the SBOM, creating a living document that is always current. It serves as your single source of truth for product compliance and all compliance evidence.
- Continuous Vulnerability Monitoring: The platform doesn’t just list your components; it continuously monitors them against global vulnerability databases like the NVD. When a new threat emerges that affects one of your components, you get an instant, prioritized alert. No more manual searching.
- Real-Time Risk Scoring: This is where it gets powerful. By combining the SBOM with an understanding of your product’s architecture (the threat surface), AI can provide a real-time risk score. It can tell you not just that a vulnerability exists, but how exploitable it is in the context of your specific product. This allows your teams to focus on the fires that actually matter.
- Audit-Ready, Always: Perhaps the most significant benefit is auditability. Every action – every scan, every vulnerability discovery, every patch decision – is logged and time-stamped. When an auditor asks for proof of your secure software development lifecycle, you don’t have to spend weeks gathering evidence. You simply generate a report. This reduces audit preparation time from months to hours.
This isn’t science fiction. This is the new standard for cybersecurity compliance for connected products. It’s about building a system that makes compliance a byproduct of a secure, transparent, and efficient development process.
Key Takeaways for Your Next Strategy Meeting
What is the biggest risk of non-compliance with the CRA? The financial penalty is the most immediate risk, with fines up to €15 million or 2.5% of global turnover. However, the loss of market access to the entire EU is an even greater business threat.
Why do I need to care about both NIS2 and the CRA? The CRA applies to the security of your products. NIS2 applies to the security of your organization if you operate in a critical sector. They work together to secure the entire digital ecosystem.
What is the most critical first step? Gaining a complete and accurate Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) for all your connected products. You cannot secure what you do not know you have.
Is manual compliance possible? For any company operating at scale, manual compliance is not a viable strategy. It is too slow, error-prone, and fails to create the auditable records required by regulators. Automation is a necessity.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Q: Do these regulations apply to products we already have on the market?
While the CRA generally applies to products placed on the market before 11 December 2027 only if those products are substantially modified afterward, a critical derogation requires all manufacturers to comply with the obligations for reporting actively exploited vulnerabilities and severe security incidents starting much earlier, on 11 September 2026. The expectation is a move toward providing security support for a product’s reasonable expected lifetime, not just until the warranty expires. - Q: We are a US-based company. Do we still need to comply?
Absolutely. If you sell, or intend to sell, any product with digital elements within the European Union, you must comply with the Cyber Resilience Act. The rules apply to any product placed on the EU market, regardless of where the manufacturer is based. - Q: My suppliers are resistant to providing component information. What can I do?
This is a common and significant challenge. The new regulations give you leverage. Compliance with standards like NIST SP 800-161 and the CRA requires you to flow down security requirements to your suppliers. You should begin updating your procurement contracts to make providing security information (like SBOMs) a mandatory contractual obligation. - Q: What’s the best way to get started without getting overwhelmed?
Start with a single product line. Conduct a pilot project to generate an automated SBOM and perform a risk assessment. This will give you a realistic understanding of the gaps in your current processes and help you build a business case for a more scalable, platform-based solution. The key is to start now, learn, and iterate.
Your Next Step Towards Compliance Confidence
The era of treating cybersecurity as an afterthought is over. Regulations like the CRA and NIS2 have established a new baseline where security is integral to product design, development, and maintenance.
The stakes are high, but the path forward is clear. Embracing an automated, AI-powered approach to compliance isn’t just about avoiding fines; it’s about building better, safer products. It’s about earning customer trust and future-proofing your business in a world that is only becoming more connected.
Don’t wait for the deadlines to dictate your strategy. Take control of your compliance journey today.
See how the C2P platform can help you automate your global product compliance, turning regulatory risk into a competitive advantage. Talk to an expert today.
Experience the Future of ESG Compliance
The Compliance & Risks Sustainability Platform is available now with a 30-day free trial. Experience firsthand how AI-driven, human-verified intelligence transforms regulatory complexity into strategic clarity.
👉 Start your free trial today and see how your team can lead the future of ESG compliance.
The future of compliance is predictive, verifiable, and strategic. The only question is: Will you be leading it, or catching up to it?
Simplify Corporate Sustainability Compliance
Six months of research, done in 60 seconds. Cut through ESG chaos and act with clarity. Try C&R Sustainability Free.
