The Complete Guide to Product Impact Data for ESG Reporting: From Digital Product Passports to Framework Compliance

This blog was originally posted on 30th August, 2025. Further regulatory developments may have occurred after publication. To keep up-to-date with the latest compliance news, sign up to our newsletter.

The global shift toward mandatory environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure has fundamentally changed how companies approach product data collection and reporting. With regulations like the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) requiring detailed product-level insights and the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) mandating Digital Product Passports (DPPs) for nearly all products sold in the EU by 2030, organizations face an unprecedented need to connect granular product impact data to sophisticated reporting frameworks.

This comprehensive guide reveals how leading companies are transforming their product compliance data into strategic ESG assets, mapping lifecycle footprints and material traceability systems to GRI, SASB, and CSRD requirements while building competitive advantages through transparency and risk mitigation.

Table of Contents

• Understanding the ESG-Product Data Connection
• The Digital Product Passport Foundation
• Product Lifecycle Data Architecture
• Material Traceability Systems
• Mapping Product Data to ESG Frameworks
• Industry-Specific Implementation Strategies
• Technology Infrastructure Requirements
• Building Your Implementation Roadmap
• Frequently Asked Questions

Understanding the ESG-Product Data Connection

The convergence of product compliance requirements and ESG reporting mandates represents more than regulatory alignment—it’s reshaping how companies conceptualize value creation and risk management. Organizations that previously treated product compliance as a cost center now recognize product impact data as fundamental to their sustainability narrative and competitive positioning.

The Regulatory Convergence

Three major regulatory frameworks are driving this transformation. The EU’s ESPR will require Digital Product Passports for approximately 95% of products sold in the European market, creating an unprecedented repository of product-level environmental and social impact data. Simultaneously, the CSRD expands mandatory sustainability reporting to over 50,000 companies, demanding granular disclosures about product impacts throughout value chains.

The CSRD’s double materiality principle specifically requires companies to disclose not only how sustainability issues affect their business performance but also their impact on people and the environment—making product-level impact data essential for compliance. Companies subject to both regulations face the opportunity to leverage DPP data collection efforts to satisfy CSRD disclosure requirements, creating operational efficiencies and data consistency across regulatory obligations. While the initial CSRD was estimated to cover around 50,000 companies in the European Union, the proposed Omnibus changes would reduce that number by approximately 80% which would leave an estimated 7,000 to 10,000 companies in scope if finalized.

Market Dynamics and Growth Projections

The Digital Product Passport market reflects this regulatory momentum, with projections showing growth from approximately $300 million in 2024 to over $8 billion by 2034—representing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of up to 39.2%. This growth trajectory indicates not just compliance-driven adoption but recognition of DPPs as strategic business tools for supply chain transparency, consumer engagement, and ESG performance improvement.

Companies implementing comprehensive product impact data systems report several unexpected benefits beyond regulatory compliance. These include improved supplier relationships through enhanced transparency requirements, reduced insurance premiums due to better risk documentation, and accelerated innovation cycles driven by clearer understanding of product environmental impacts.

The Digital Product Passport Foundation

Digital Product Passports represent a paradigm shift from traditional compliance documentation to dynamic, lifecycle-spanning data ecosystems. Unlike static compliance certificates, DPPs create living repositories of product information that evolve throughout the product lifecycle, from raw material extraction through end-of-life processing.

Core DPP Components

The European Commission’s ESPR framework defines specific data categories that DPPs must contain, each directly applicable to ESG reporting requirements. Product identification and composition data support supply chain transparency disclosures, while performance and durability metrics inform circular economy indicators. Environmental impact data, including carbon footprints and resource consumption metrics, directly feed into climate-related disclosures across all major ESG frameworks.

Repair and maintenance information within DPPs supports circular economy disclosures while demonstrating commitment to product longevity and resource efficiency. End-of-life instructions and recycling guidance provide data for waste management and circular economy metrics required under frameworks like GRI and CSRD.

Implementation Timeline and Industry Rollout

The ESPR implementation follows a carefully structured timeline designed to allow industries to adapt systematically. On 16 April 2025, the 1st working plan on priority products was published listing the 1st batch of priority product groups as follows:

• 2026: Iron & Steel
• 2027: Textiles/Apparel, Tyres, Aluminium
  • Expected DPP requirements
• 2028: Furniture
• 2029: Mattresses

This staggered approach creates strategic opportunities for early adopters. Companies implementing DPP systems ahead of their mandatory compliance dates can leverage first-mover advantages in supply chain negotiations, consumer marketing, and ESG performance differentiation. Early implementation also allows for system refinement and process optimization before regulatory enforcement begins.

Product Lifecycle Data Architecture

Effective product impact data collection requires sophisticated understanding of product lifecycles and the environmental and social touchpoints throughout each stage. Modern lifecycle assessment (LCA) methodologies provide the foundation for DPP data collection while ensuring alignment with ESG reporting requirements.

Raw Material and Sourcing Data

The foundation of product impact data lies in comprehensive raw material tracking and sourcing documentation. This includes primary material compositions, recycled content percentages, and geographic sourcing locations. For ESG reporting purposes, sourcing data must extend beyond material specifications to include social impact indicators such as labor conditions, community impacts, and human rights considerations.

Mining and extraction activities require particular attention due to their significant environmental and social impacts. Companies must document water usage, ecosystem disruption, waste generation, and community displacement associated with raw material extraction. This data directly supports CSRD disclosures on biodiversity impacts and social consequences of business operations.

Supply chain transparency extends to sub-tier suppliers, requiring documentation of manufacturing conditions, energy sources, transportation methods, and waste management practices throughout the supply network. Advanced companies implement supplier sustainability scorecards that feed directly into ESG performance metrics while providing DPP-compliant documentation.

Manufacturing and Processing Metrics

Manufacturing stage data collection focuses on resource consumption, emissions generation, and social impact indicators. Energy consumption data must distinguish between renewable and non-renewable sources, supporting both carbon footprint calculations and renewable energy transition disclosures. Water usage metrics include consumption volumes, quality impacts, and discharge characteristics, supporting water stewardship reporting requirements.

Waste generation data encompasses both hazardous and non-hazardous waste streams, including recycling rates and disposal methods. Companies implementing circular economy principles document material recovery rates, reprocessing capabilities, and closed-loop manufacturing achievements. This information supports circular economy disclosures while demonstrating operational efficiency improvements.

Social impact data from manufacturing operations includes employment metrics, health and safety performance, training and development investments, and community engagement activities. These metrics support social pillar disclosures while demonstrating commitment to responsible business practices throughout value chains.

Distribution and Use Phase Tracking

Distribution phase data collection comprises transportation methods, packaging materials, and logistics efficiency metrics. Carbon emissions from transportation activities support Scope 3 emissions calculations while demonstrating supply chain optimization efforts. Packaging data includes material compositions, recyclability characteristics, and waste reduction initiatives.

Use phase data requirements vary significantly across product categories but generally include energy consumption patterns, maintenance requirements, and performance degradation rates. For electronic products, this encompasses energy efficiency ratings, software update impacts, and functionality evolution. For textile products, use phase data includes durability testing results, care instruction impacts, and aesthetic longevity considerations.

Consumer engagement data, where available, provides insights into actual usage patterns, maintenance compliance, and satisfaction metrics. This information supports product design improvements while providing evidence of actual versus intended environmental performance.

Material Traceability Systems

Advanced material traceability systems form the backbone of credible product impact data collection and ESG reporting. These systems extend beyond simple supply chain mapping to create comprehensive documentation of material flows, processing activities, and impact accumulation throughout product lifecycles.

Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies

Blockchain technology addresses fundamental challenges in supply chain transparency by creating immutable records of material transactions and processing activities. Leading implementations combine blockchain documentation with IoT sensors and automated data collection systems to create real-time traceability networks that support both DPP requirements and ESG disclosures.

Successful blockchain implementations focus on specific high-risk materials or processes rather than attempting comprehensive supply chain coverage. Conflict minerals traceability, organic certification verification, and recycled content validation represent common starting points for blockchain deployment. These focused implementations demonstrate immediate compliance value while building organizational capabilities for broader system expansion.

Interoperability considerations become critical as multiple blockchain networks emerge across different industries and regions. Companies must evaluate blockchain platforms based on their ability to integrate with existing enterprise systems, share data with supply chain partners, and adapt to evolving regulatory requirements.

Digital Twins and IoT Integration

Digital twin technologies create virtual representations of physical products that evolve throughout the product lifecycle, incorporating real-time data from IoT sensors and user interactions. For ESG reporting purposes, digital twins provide unprecedented visibility into actual product performance versus designed specifications, supporting accurate impact calculations.

Mapping Product Data to ESG Frameworks

Successfully translating product impact data into meaningful ESG disclosures requires strategic alignment between data collection systems and specific framework requirements. The most effective implementations create structured mapping processes that ensure product-level insights directly support disclosure obligations while maintaining data integrity and audit readiness.

GRI Standards Integration

The Global Reporting Initiative’s updated standards emphasize outcome-based reporting that requires granular product performance data. GRI 301 (Materials) specifically demands disclosure of materials used by weight or volume, percentage of recycled input materials, and reclaimed products and packaging materials. Product impact data systems must capture this information at sufficient granularity to support aggregated reporting while maintaining traceability to individual product lines.

GRI 302 (Energy) and GRI 305 (Emissions) require comprehensive energy consumption and emissions data throughout value chains, making product lifecycle data essential for accurate Scope 3 calculations. Companies implementing Digital Product Passports often find their DPP data collection efforts naturally align with GRI requirements, creating operational efficiencies and improved data quality.

Water stewardship reporting under GRI 303 benefits significantly from product-specific water usage data, particularly for companies with water-intensive manufacturing processes. Product impact data systems that track water consumption by production unit or product category enable more accurate watershed impact assessments and support targeted water reduction initiatives.

SASB Framework Application

The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board’s industry-specific approach requires tailored product data collection strategies that align with sector-specific material issues. For technology companies, SASB standards emphasize product energy efficiency, hazardous materials content, and end-of-life management—all directly supported by comprehensive product impact data systems.

Consumer goods companies face SASB requirements for packaging materials, product safety metrics, and supply chain labor conditions. Product passport initiatives naturally capture much of this information, creating synergies between compliance efforts and SASB disclosure preparation. The key lies in structuring data collection to support both operational decision-making and standardized reporting formats.

SASB’s focus on financially material sustainability issues requires companies to demonstrate clear connections between product-level sustainability performance and business outcomes. Advanced companies use product impact data to quantify relationships between environmental performance improvements and cost savings, revenue growth, or risk mitigation achievements.

CSRD Double Materiality Implementation

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive’s double materiality principle creates unique opportunities for companies with comprehensive product impact data systems. CSRD requires disclosure of both financial materiality (how sustainability issues affect the company) and impact materiality (how the company affects people and the environment), making product-level impact data essential for complete compliance.

CSRD’s detailed disclosure requirements extend to value chain impacts, requiring companies to report on environmental and social effects throughout their product lifecycles. Digital Product Passports provide exactly this type of comprehensive lifecycle documentation, supporting ESG compliance and sustainability reporting while meeting ESPR compliance requirements simultaneously.

The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) has emphasized that CSRD implementation should leverage existing data collection systems wherever possible. Companies with established product impact data systems find themselves well-positioned to meet CSRD requirements without duplicating data collection efforts, creating significant operational advantages over competitors starting from scratch.

Industry-Specific Implementation Strategies

Different industries face unique challenges and opportunities in connecting product impact data to ESG reporting requirements. Successful implementations recognize these sector-specific considerations while building scalable systems that can adapt to evolving regulatory requirements and stakeholder expectations.

Technology and Electronics Sector

Technology companies face complex product impact data requirements due to their global supply chains, rapid product evolution cycles, and significant end-of-life environmental impacts. The electronics industry’s implementation of Digital Product Passports focuses heavily on conflict minerals traceability, energy efficiency metrics, and recycling content documentation.

Leading technology companies integrate product impact data collection with existing product lifecycle management (PLM) systems, creating seamless data flows from design through end-of-life. This integration enables real-time impact assessment during product development, supporting design for sustainability initiatives while ensuring DPP compliance from product launch.

The sector’s emphasis on innovation creates opportunities for competitive differentiation through superior product impact data systems. Companies that can demonstrate measurable environmental performance improvements across product generations build stronger customer loyalty while supporting premium pricing strategies. This competitive dynamic drives continuous improvement in data collection sophistication and reporting transparency.

Semiconductor manufacturing presents particular challenges due to the complexity of fabrication processes and the criticality of supply chain security. Advanced companies implement supplier relationship management systems that combine sustainability performance tracking with supply chain resilience metrics, supporting both ESG disclosures and operational risk management.

Consumer Goods and Retail

Consumer goods companies face unique challenges in product impact data collection due to their extensive product portfolios, complex packaging requirements, and direct consumer interface responsibilities. The sector’s implementation strategies often prioritize high-volume or high-impact product categories while building scalable systems for broader portfolio coverage.

Packaging represents a critical focus area for consumer goods ESG reporting, with product impact data systems capturing material compositions, recycling rates, and innovative packaging solutions. Companies implementing circular economy principles document packaging reduction achievements, reusable packaging programs, and closed-loop packaging systems that support circular economy disclosures across multiple ESG frameworks.

Private label product management creates additional complexity, requiring consumer goods companies to extend product impact data collection to their supplier partners and co-manufacturers. Successful implementations establish clear data sharing agreements and standardized reporting formats that enable consistent impact measurement across diverse supplier networks.

Consumer engagement data provides unique opportunities for consumer goods companies to demonstrate actual versus intended environmental performance. Advanced companies implement product usage tracking systems that combine consumer surveys, IoT sensors, and behavioral analytics to understand real-world environmental impacts and support product design improvements.

Manufacturing and Industrial Goods

Manufacturing companies benefit from existing process control systems and quality management frameworks that can be extended to support comprehensive product impact data collection. The sector’s emphasis on operational efficiency creates natural alignment between sustainability performance improvement and cost reduction initiatives.

Industrial goods manufacturers often face complex multi-year product development cycles that require early integration of product impact considerations. Leading companies implement stage-gate processes that incorporate sustainability performance targets and impact assessment requirements at each development milestone, ensuring DPP compliance and ESG performance optimization from product concept through commercial launch.

The sector’s B2B customer relationships enable collaborative approaches to product impact data collection and sharing. Advanced manufacturers work closely with their customers to develop joint sustainability performance targets and shared impact measurement systems that support both companies’ ESG reporting requirements while strengthening commercial relationships.

Technology Infrastructure Requirements

Building robust product impact data collection systems requires careful consideration of technology architecture, integration capabilities, and scalability requirements. The most successful implementations balance immediate compliance needs with long-term strategic objectives while maintaining flexibility for evolving regulatory requirements.

Data Management Platform Architecture

Modern product impact data systems require sophisticated data management platforms capable of handling diverse data types, multiple data sources, and complex analytical requirements. Cloud-native architectures provide the scalability and flexibility necessary to accommodate growth in data volume and complexity while supporting integration with existing enterprise systems.

Master data management becomes critical for maintaining data consistency across product portfolios, supplier networks, and reporting frameworks. Leading companies implement product information management (PIM) systems that serve as single sources of truth for product specifications, impact data, and compliance documentation. These systems support both operational decision-making and regulatory reporting while reducing data maintenance overhead.

API-first architectures enable seamless integration between product impact data systems and existing enterprise applications including ERP, PLM, and sustainability management platforms. This integration capability ensures that product impact considerations become embedded in standard business processes rather than requiring separate compliance-focused workflows.

Data lineage and audit trail capabilities prove essential for regulatory compliance and stakeholder credibility. Advanced systems automatically track data sources, transformation processes, and approval workflows, creating comprehensive documentation that supports both internal quality assurance and external verification requirements.

Integration and Interoperability Standards

Product impact data systems must integrate with diverse technology ecosystems across supply chains, requiring careful attention to interoperability standards and data exchange protocols. Companies across different industries require specialized compliance solutions like GS1 Digital Link for retail and ECLASS for industrial products provide proven frameworks for standardized data sharing.

EDI evolution toward API-based integration creates opportunities for real-time product impact data sharing between supply chain partners. Companies implementing these advanced integration capabilities can achieve near real-time visibility into supply chain sustainability performance while reducing manual data collection overhead.

Blockchain integration requires evaluation of different distributed ledger technologies and their suitability for specific use cases. Private blockchain networks often prove most practical for supply chain transparency applications, providing controlled access and data sharing while maintaining commercial confidentiality where required.

IoT data integration presents opportunities for real-time product performance monitoring and impact assessment. Advanced companies implement edge computing capabilities that process sensor data locally while transmitting summary information to central data management systems, optimizing bandwidth usage and response times.

Building Your Implementation Roadmap

Developing a comprehensive product impact data system requires strategic planning that balances immediate compliance needs with long-term business objectives. The most successful implementations follow structured approaches that build capabilities incrementally while maintaining focus on business value creation.

Foundation and Assessment Phase

Begin with comprehensive assessment of current data collection capabilities, regulatory requirements, and business objectives. This foundation phase identifies existing data sources, quality levels, and gaps that must be addressed to support both DPP compliance and ESG reporting requirements.

Stakeholder mapping proves critical for understanding different user requirements and success criteria. Internal stakeholders including procurement, manufacturing, marketing, and sustainability teams often have different data needs and quality expectations that must be balanced in system design. External stakeholders including customers, suppliers, and regulators require different levels of access and detail in reported information.

Risk assessment should evaluate both compliance risks from inadequate data collection and competitive risks from delayed implementation. Companies that can quantify potential costs of non-compliance, competitive disadvantages, and missed market opportunities often achieve stronger organizational support for comprehensive implementation efforts.

Technology landscape assessment identifies existing systems that can be leveraged or extended to support product impact data collection. ERP systems, quality management platforms, and supplier management tools often contain relevant data that can be enhanced rather than replaced, reducing implementation costs and time requirements.

Pilot Implementation and Testing

Pilot implementations should focus on specific product categories or geographic markets that provide learning opportunities while minimizing business risk. High-volume products, regulated product categories, or products with well-established supply chains often provide ideal pilot opportunities.

Supplier engagement strategies must balance collaboration and compliance requirements. Leading companies establish supplier sustainability scorecards that reward enhanced data sharing while providing clear expectations for data quality and submission timing. Early supplier engagement often identifies data collection challenges that can be addressed before full-scale implementation.

Data quality monitoring systems should be implemented from the beginning of pilot programs to establish baseline performance and identify improvement opportunities. Automated validation rules, exception reporting, and continuous monitoring capabilities help maintain data integrity while reducing manual oversight requirements.

Integration testing with existing business systems ensures that product impact data becomes embedded in standard business processes rather than creating separate compliance workflows. This integration reduces long-term maintenance requirements while improving user adoption and data quality.

Scaling and Optimization Strategies

Full-scale implementation requires systematic rollout approaches that maintain data quality while achieving complete portfolio coverage. Phased rollout by product category, geographic region, or organizational unit often proves most manageable while allowing for continuous process refinement.

Change management becomes critical during scaling phases as larger numbers of employees and suppliers must adapt to new data collection requirements. Training programs, communication strategies, and performance incentives help ensure successful adoption while maintaining data quality standards.

Continuous improvement processes should be established to capture lessons learned and optimize system performance over time. Regular reviews of data quality metrics, user feedback, and regulatory developments enable proactive system enhancements that maintain competitive advantages.

Performance measurement systems should track both compliance metrics and business value creation. Companies that can demonstrate clear returns on investment through improved sustainability performance, reduced compliance costs, or enhanced customer relationships often achieve continued organizational support for system enhancement and expansion. Leading organizations that have implemented comprehensive compliance solutions consistently report measurable improvements in operational efficiency and risk mitigation capabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Q: What distinguishes Digital Product Passports from traditional compliance documentation?
   Digital Product Passports represent a fundamental shift from static compliance certificates to dynamic, lifecycle-spanning information ecosystems. While traditional documentation captures conditions at specific moments, DPPs evolve continuously throughout product lifecycles, incorporating real-time updates from manufacturing processes, usage patterns, and end-of-life activities. This dynamic nature makes them particularly valuable for ESG reporting, which demands ongoing performance monitoring rather than point-in-time verification.
2. Q: How do companies maintain data accuracy across complex global supply networks?
   Successful companies implement layered verification approaches combining automated validation systems, regular supplier audits, and third-party verification services. They prioritize primary data collection through direct supplier integration and IoT monitoring while establishing clear hierarchies for secondary data and industry estimates. Supplier performance management systems include sustainability data quality metrics, creating financial incentives for accurate reporting while building collaborative improvement relationships.
3. Q: Which ESG framework should guide product impact data system design?
   Rather than optimizing for single frameworks, leading companies design flexible architectures capable of supporting multiple reporting standards simultaneously. The CSRD’s comprehensive scope and mandatory implementation make it a logical foundation for European operations, while GRI provides globally recognized sustainability structures. SASB adds valuable industry-specific considerations. The strategic approach involves creating data collection systems that map efficiently to multiple framework requirements without duplicating collection efforts.
4. Q: What investment levels and timeframes should companies expect for comprehensive implementation?
   Implementation investments vary significantly based on organizational complexity, product diversity, and existing system capabilities. Mid-size manufacturers typically invest $500,000 to $2 million over 6-12 months for focused pilot implementations, while comprehensive enterprise deployments may require $5-20 million over 18-36 months. However, companies frequently achieve positive returns within 2-3 years through operational efficiencies, supplier relationship improvements, and competitive positioning advantages.
5. Q: How can organizations balance transparency demands with commercial confidentiality requirements?
   Advanced systems implement granular access controls and stakeholder-specific information views that satisfy transparency obligations while protecting sensitive commercial data. Companies can share sustainability performance metrics and impact assessments while maintaining confidentiality around supplier relationships, cost structures, and proprietary processes. Zero-trust security architectures ensure appropriate access levels while supporting regulatory compliance and stakeholder engagement requirements.
6. Q: What strategies address supplier data collection limitations?
   Companies typically implement graduated approaches beginning with supplier education and capability building programs. Initial implementations may accept industry-average estimates while developing direct measurement capabilities through shared investments and technical assistance. Supplier development initiatives, phased compliance requirements, and collaborative data sharing agreements help smaller partners build necessary capabilities. Long-term strategies may involve supply base consolidation toward partners with stronger sustainability data capabilities.
7. Q: How does product impact data drive business value beyond regulatory compliance?
   Comprehensive product impact systems enable strategic decision-making across multiple business functions. Design teams leverage lifecycle impact data for sustainability-focused innovation, while procurement organizations integrate environmental and social metrics into supplier evaluation and management. Marketing teams develop evidence-based sustainability messaging, and operations teams identify cost reduction opportunities through resource efficiency improvements. Risk management benefits from enhanced supply chain visibility and impact assessment capabilities.
8. Q: What role do emerging technologies play in advancing product impact data collection?
   Artificial intelligence automates data extraction from diverse sources while identifying patterns in complex supply chain information. Machine learning algorithms estimate missing data points and predict sustainability performance trends, while natural language processing extracts relevant insights from supplier documentation. IoT sensors provide real-time product performance monitoring, and blockchain technology creates immutable supply chain transparency records. Edge computing optimizes data processing efficiency while maintaining system responsiveness.
9. Q: How should companies address data quality inconsistencies and supplier reporting variations?
   Systematic validation processes combine automated quality checks with structured manual reviews to identify and resolve inconsistencies. Clear escalation procedures address quality issues while supplier training programs tackle root causes of reporting variations. Regular audit programs, industry benchmark comparisons, and third-party verification maintain data integrity standards. Performance-based supplier agreements create financial incentives for accurate reporting while establishing consequences for persistent quality problems.
10. Q: What factors determine long-term success in product impact data system implementation?
    Sustained success requires strong leadership commitment, clear business value demonstration, and continuous capability evolution. Change management programs ensure organizational adoption while comprehensive training maintains data quality standards. Regular technology updates, proactive regulatory monitoring, and systematic stakeholder feedback integration keep systems aligned with evolving requirements. Most critically, organizations must approach product impact data as strategic business assets rather than compliance overhead to achieve meaningful value creation and competitive advantage. Companies that successfully implement comprehensive ESG readiness strategies consistently demonstrate superior performance in both regulatory adherence and business growth metrics.

Stay Ahead Of Regulatory Changes in Corporate Sustainability

Want to stay ahead of regulatory developments in sustainability?

Accelerate your ability to achieve, maintain & expand market access for all products in global markets with C2P – your key to unlocking market access, trusted by more than 300 of the world’s leading brands.

C2P is an enterprise SaaS platform providing everything you need in one place to achieve your business objectives by proving compliance in over 195 countries.

C2P is purpose-built to be tailored to your specific needs with comprehensive capabilities that enable enterprise-wide management of regulations, standards, requirements and evidence.
Add-on packages help accelerate market access through use-case-specific solutions, global regulatory content, a global team of subject matter experts and professional services.

• Accelerate time-to-market for products
• Reduce non-compliance risks that impact your ability to meet business goals and cause reputational damage
• Enable business continuity by digitizing your compliance process and building corporate memory
• Improve efficiency and enable your team to focus on business critical initiatives rather than manual tasks
• Save time with access to Compliance & Risks’ extensive Knowledge Partner network

Simplify Corporate Sustainability Compliance

Six months of research, done in 60 seconds. Cut through ESG chaos and act with clarity. Try C&R Sustainability Free.

start trial